Hatred General Discussions Topic Details. May 28, 2015 @ 6:28am First + Third Person MOD please? Showing 1-10 of 10 comments. Yeah because its easy to make a first,third person mod of an isometric shooter people need to think more. The game was made meant to be looked from that perspective you would have a lot of work. You mean mod for TPS, FPS, Colour mod and etc? Because most of addons have been hidden Igoreso author Jun 1 @ 3:33am It is temporarily hidden because a new, better mod will released by other modder quite soon-ish (hopefully somewhere this or next week, but I don't have exact info).
Back in 2014 Hatred was released and crowned one of the most controversial games of that year. Your goal was to kill as many humans as possible by playing as a misanthropic mass-killing sociopath. It was removed from Steam Greenlight due to its extremely violent content, but was brought back and successfully greenlit a couple of weeks later.
- 316 votes, 26 comments. 347k members in the StarWarsBattlefront community. The subreddit dedicated to the discussion of the Star Wars: Battlefront.
- I've read about a mod at nexusmods that tries to enable a 3rd person view but with rather negligible success. A friend told me a few month ago that native mod support will be added to KDC soon and that at that point a working 3rd person mod may be made available.
Destructive Creations Studio has announced that a free FPS Mod has been released for everyone that already bought the game. The Mod was created by a community member and a little bit of help from the development team, who’d like to thank the autor’s amazing effort.
Curious how the game looks with this FPS Mod? Check out these screenshots!
Related Items
Hatred Third Person Mod Crash
There seem to be people who hate ECMAScript 5’s strict mode. This post shows that this hatred is not justified and provides work-arounds for features that are missing. Quicken cracked torrent.
Hatred Third Person Modern
The funniest example of strict mode hatred is in the RiverTrail code base, where NBody.js starts as follows:But if you look at what strict mode takes away then you find out that it only serves to make JavaScript a cleaner language.
Work-arounds for missing features
Strict mode eliminates some of JavaScript’s more questionable features. Here is a list of what is missing and how to work around it:- No more with statement. This statement causes performance and security problems [2]. Work-around: Instead of you can use an IIFE [3] and write
- No more arguments.caller. This property was removed due to security concerns (unsafe code should not be able to access its caller). There is no replacement for it, you’ll have to introduce an additional parameter.
- No more arguments.callee. This property offers a convenient way of accessing the current function inside the function itself, without referring to a global variable or a variable in the surrounding scope. A named function expression looks like a function declaration (a statement), but is in fact an expression. It gives the function a name that is only accessible from within the function. That allows you to rewrite the above code as follows:
- No more global access via this. This has always been more of a bug than a feature – you could access the global object via this in non-method functions. This can lead to accidentally creating global variables (e.g. if you call a constructor without new). The following is an example of legitimate use: Strict mode does not allow the above – this is undefined in non-method functions. You can use the following work-around: But you might not even need to access the global object inside the IIFE:
- No more octal numbers. Now 0100 really is 100 and not 64. And 08 is not an error, any more. I can’t imagine that anyone misses octals.
Related reading